10 Jul
2010
Posted in: Book Review
By    6 Comments

Book Review: Reimagining Church, with a bit of testimony

The offer review Frank Viola’s Reimagining Church came at just the right time. For the last couple of years, my wife and I have been really been trekking through changes in our practice, in how we must embrace our convictions more and truly trust in the Lord, in our ecclesiology, and in various other aspects of how our family should be living the Kingdom.

Likely the most pressing issue was that of the Church and local bodies. For so long we had both been raised in large churches—the kind Frank Viola refers to as “the institutional church.” It’s not that we were comfortable; it was more like there was nothing different to experience. That church experience was church. To diverge from it was to diverge from God himself.

But then we became a part of a very small, very community-minded congregation, which was (get this…hold on…wait for it) elder led.

Oooooh.

I know: heresy.

No pastors. What? That’s right: no pastors.

Communion every week. And it’s not a waste of time by now? I hear ya.

An emphasis on home fellowships, where we ate together every time. Scandalous. There was even one group that focused the study on the kids. Isn’t that a cult?

What it was was different. To me and my wife, that was a different church, a different experience, a different way to live the Kingdom. And through time, conversation, trials and so forth, we came to a place where our fundamental understanding of the Church and local congregations dramatically changed. Pair that with our embracing the Anabaptist legacy, and you’ve now got yourself a couple of trouble makers.

But there was always difficulty with articulating just what was going on in our heads, and why. We knew there were differences between the way local churches were structured and what we found in the New Testament. We saw the business like structure of local congregations and struggled to find any such traditions in the Scriptures. And, for the most part, we were at a loss to find many others who were seeing the same thing. So I chuckled a little bit when I came across this passage in the book’s preface:

There will be two major responses to this book. One will sound something like this: “Thank goodness, I’m not crazy! I thought I lost my mind. I’m grateful there are others who feel the same way I do about church. This book has given language to feelings and beliefs I’ve had for years. And it’s given me hope that there really is a church life experience beyond what’s commonly known and accepted.”

That loneliness is probably the most difficult part. How often we thought of giving up and turning back to the way things were. We’d know more people, wouldn’t add any stress to any family members that maybe didn’t like the direction we were going. How often we took a step back and wondered “Maybe we’re the one’s wrong about this.” It’s kind of a relief when you realize you’re not alone in the struggle. You sort of form a community of people seeking to live out the Kingdom community.

Reimagining Church asks serious, challenging questions of the disciple of Jesus. You might be able to sum it up this way: If the way church is done today is wrong (e.g. unbiblical, subverting the community, relegating Jesus to an outside role), then are you willing to do something about it?

My wife and I were very enthralled by this book. It has encouraged us in our journey, and challenged us to take further steps. We already knew the vast majority of the content, the information. But, much like the Way as a whole, being alone is extremely difficult, if not impossible. But, being part of a unified body, a community focused on Jesus our head, we can push forward with strength, faith, empowerment, confidence, and hope.

This is definitely a text to give to friends and family. This is a text to go through and have conversations about.

And for those who might think this is just some more emergent minded splosh with no real care for doctrine and truth, that couldn’t be further from reality. Throughout the text, Frank Viola reminds the reader of the trinitarian foundation of the Church and of community.

This is an extremely valuable book. Very challenging, but well worth the struggle.

The book was intended to be read after going through Pagan Christianity, by Viola and George Barna, which we have not read yet. We look forward to the opportunity to pick up that text and learn more, be challenged more. Reimagining Church is more the practical growth of the seed planted by Pagan Christianity. At least, that’s my understanding. So going back to the foundations will be a great adventure.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Book Review: Reimagining Church, with a bit of testimony -- Topsy.com

  • Mshedden

    Sounds like an interesting read. It's also interesting that I read this in my reader just after your post:
    http://willimon.blogspot.com/2010/07/more-on-nu…
    Granted being a Mennonite pastor I don't have to deal with Wesley I am unsure how to find a middle road between these poles, as much as just letting each one be what each one is and accepting difference. I think the problem with Pagan Christianity was that Viola really didn't think the “institutional church” was worth anything and should be abandoned. I honestly like what he is doing but I am not sure it is the only way either. But if you have any ideas on a middle road between the two I would love to know.

  • GaryQ

    Thanks for the review…..I'm going to read it!! The saying, The “good” often becomes enemy of the “best”, comes to my mind when talking about institutional Christianity, especially in our personal walk/relationship with Jesus Christ.

  • http://schleitheim.com martyrologist

    Awesome.

  • http://schleitheim.com martyrologist

    I look forward to reading Pagan Christianity. From this book I got the impression not so much that the institutional church was worthless, but, because it's not the idea portrayed in the New Testament, or that the model of the institutional church in ways is contrary to what we see in Scripture, then the institutional church should be avoided. Not for avoidance sake, but for the sake of finding something more authentic, genuine, truly kingdom-like. Nor would I necessarily advocate seeking a middle road. I'm a bit more idealistic anyway.

  • http://www.mshedden.com Mshedden

    Yeah I guess idealism isn't all that interesting of a category to me. I dislike the word “institutional church” because it seems to neglect the character of whatever that means. It emphasis seems to lean on “institutional” and that means as a young postmodern I should fear whatever it is attached too. That's why I use scare quotes. I guess I haven't been convinced that the churches most people are a part of and find faith in are “contrary to what we see in scripture.” That it isn't portrayed is a somewhat stronger argument, but it just reminds me too much Zwingli (who I have never found an appreciation for).
    I think my hope for these conversations and part of my hope for Christianity is that we begin to find a plurality of ways we witness to what has happened (and happens) in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus. I think Viola and Barna remind me more of the people who would accuse you of joining a cult, as they would accuse me of becoming a slave to the machine (or something along those lines.) It ends up not being all that helpful of a discussion. Gary's comment seems to strike at some of the struggle I have with this as he appeals to “our personal walk with Jesus.” Can I ask, does the house church/community road down to this kind of individual pietism?
    You ask “what would be your take on tradition within the Church?” I would like to answer that question but it is pretty broad for me, could you narrow it down some?
    Ben Witherington has written several posts on Pagan Christianity that you can find here:
    http://benwitherington.blogspot.com/2008/06/pag…