Review of Redwall by Brian Jacques

9 June 2010 Book ReviewSchleitheim AcademyTop Stories  8 comments

I had mentioned in a previous post that we were thinking of including Redwall by Brian Jacques in our free-reading list for the boys this year for school.  I always like to pre-read anything that we are going let the boys read, just to make sure that it is appropriate for where they are in their development and also to see if the book agrees with what we want to teach the boys, so that if it doesn’t, we can be prepared to discuss it with the boys or hold off until they are mature enough to be able to discuss it.

I wanted to start this review by saying that Redwall is a very well written book. I read in the author bio in the back that Brian Jacques originally penned this for the children of the Royal School for the Blind in Liverpool. It really shows in the descriptiveness of the tale. You almost feel as if you can jump right into the story with the characters. It is a great tale of bravery and honor.

With that being said I am now going to share the main reasons why the boys will not be reading Redwall as part of their free reading this school year. Or for many school years to come. I would like them to read it eventually, but I want to be able to discuss it with them and I think we will just have to see where each one of them is maturity-wise  to be able to judge when they are ready for it.

To give the basic background of the story (look out for spoilers!) there is an Abbey inhabited by mice who look after all of their fellow woodland creatures and help them out in any way they can. They lead a peaceful existence because of battles fought long ago by their hero Martin the Warrior (think along the lines of how St. George is revered in most King Arthur tales).  Their existence is peaceful, that is, until Cluny the Scourge and his rat (and other rodent type animals) horde shows up and starts making trouble for the creatures of the Abbey and the surrounding Mossflower Wood. A small novice in the Abbey, Matthias is determined to help the Abbey and bring back the bravery and protection of Martin the Warrior. That about sums it up so you can follow along if you haven’t read the book.

I have several issues with  allowing my boys to read this book at this point in their young lives. The main ones that I will break down for  you are:

  • The use of abhorrent violence by both parties in a tale obviously geared for children.
  • The lack of mercy towards enemies, even when opportunities could have been written into the story very easily.
  • The propagation of the errant view that all pacifists are foolish pushovers who must be saved by those who are willing to fight.

The Use of Violence

There were numerous instances throughout the book where violence was used without a second thought for the death and destruction it would cause. If it had just been the enemies who were using violence, I think it would be understandable because they are, after all, a merciless horde of rats. The violence that I found abhorrent was that which was perpetrated by the defenders of the Abbey. To name a few:

  • Throwing rats to their death when they tried to breech the Abbey by climbing over the wall from a plank leaned out from a tree.
  • The killing, or more appropriately, the murder of a rat “enemy” by one of the main characters of the book, Constance the badger, with her bare hands.
  • The pouring of boiling hot water down into the face of one of the lead rats and down a tunnel which was then collapsed on top of the conquering horde, killing multitudes in what had to be a very painful, tortuous death.

I feel that in this culture my kids get enough exposure to excessive violence on their own without me introducing it straight into their lives at such a tender age.

Lack of Mercy

I was disappointed that in a tale about an abbey there were not more instances of mercy. The only instance that really stood out to me was when Cluny attempted the murder of Chickenhound Fox and failed, then the fox came to the abbey and was accepted in by Abbot Mortimer even if the fox wasn’t willing to give up secrets he held. This was a true act of mercy on the Abbot’s part. There were several more opportunities for mercy that the author could have written into the story but didn’t. They are as follows:

  • When the rat Shadow climbed over the Abbey wall and stole the portion of the tapestry that had Martin the Warriors picture on it, he then fell over the wall very far and survived for a bit. Cluny approached and did not show mercy, but took the tapestry and left Shadow to die. At this point in the story, Shadow obviously realizes that he has done wrong, as is evidenced by his exchange with Matthias right before Shadow’s death. It would have been a perfect opportunity for the Abbot to extend mercy and healing to this rat in order for him to turn over a new leaf, but alas, the character dies and the opportunity for mercy is lost.
  • During the time that the rats and rodents are thrown down from the elm tree, Cluny is injured and taken away by his rat cohorts to recover. The ferret Scragg, was injured in the fall and left behind. As Matthias and a baby squirrel watch, one of the rat horde, Cheesethief, comes back to finish off Scragg by stepping on his throat until he dies. Matthias does nothing and goes about his business when the coast is clear.
  • At the end of the last battle with the rats no rats are given quarter or taken prisoner. They are killed to the last animal.

The opportunity for mercy is important in a child’s life. It is important in how our family feels convicted to live out our faith.

Pacifists are Fools and Victims

This is a view that we as a family come across quite often when we discuss pacifism and non-resistance with other people, including other believers. The course of the conversation seems to fixate on the fact that the world in inherently bad and nothing will ever change that and we are naive to think that peace can ever overcome violence. A great example of this thinking is evidenced in how the different characters in the story are seen as viewing the Abbot. At first he is a venerable figure who looks after the peace and goodwill of the Abbey. As the story progresses it becomes more and more clear how naive the Abbot actually is. After giving aid to Chickenhound the Fox, Chickenhound then proceeds to steal all of their valuables and while making his escape, kills the oldest and wisest member of the Order, Methuselah. Time and again the Abbot assumes that Cluny will give up his fight and leave them in peace, and time and again the defenders who know better are proven correct as Cluny attacks yet again. In the end, as Cluny attacks the Abbots friends, the Abbot finally snaps, all vestiges of peacefulness cast aside he attacks Cluny and is delivered a death blow by the poison tip of Cluny’s tail. As he dies he appoints Matthias and his family to forever be in charge of the defence of the Abbey, because obviously, peace cannot survive without some form of human defensive strategy.

——–

As I have said before, I believe this book will generate some great discussion for our family as the boys grow and mature.  I look forward to the time when they have the discernment to pull these things out of books for themselves. At this point and time, it is still up to Eddie and I to train them in the way they should go, so to speak. For the time being, Redwall will sit on our shelf (or maybe be recycled back into Paperback Swap to await a future re-swapping) and I will not be ordering any more in the series at this point. If the author Brian Jacques were to read this review that I have written of his book, I would hope that he would check out some of John Howard Yoder’s books to find out what Christian pacifists actually believe, especially the book What Would You Do.

  • toddgrotenhuis

    Another issue I had with this book (and, frankly, with much fantasy) is that it subtly (or, perhaps, not-to-subtly) pushes racist-like qualities. Rats (and orcs, etc.) are all evil. Mice (and elves, etc.) are all good. By defining species or races as automatically good guys or bad guys, it can propagate the same in reality.

  • http://thoughtsaftergod.blogspot.com Brandy Afterthoughts

    That's a lot of violence! I'm glad you clued me in because I'll definitely be pre-reading before I do this as a family read-aloud (which was my plan) just in case.

    I am not a pacifist, but I definitely understand not wanting your children to be surrounded by books telling them that your family's belief is weak, foolish, etc. I certainly try to, for instance, avoid books that push school and tell children that homeschooling is “weird” or aberrant behavior.

    Read Howard Pyle's Robin Hood if you want mercy examples. And the fights are often PLAYFUL rather than brute violence. Very good read!

    As far as the racism the above-commenter mentioned, I think that race isn't the point and never has been the point with this literary tradition (though, granted, I haven't read this particular book yet and it may be an exception given that it is written in a more modern era). Orcs, for instance, are always evil because they ARE evil. I know that sounds like circular reasoning, but I think that Tolkein was going for an embodiment idea. We can see shades of good and bad when we look at the humans and the wizards, and even Gollum (who fell into temptation, but had not always been bad). This is the same as the fairy tales where good princesses are perfectly beautiful and evil stepmothers are ugly with warts on their nose. The idea is one of the physical realm reflecting the unseen realm–embodiment.

    When we get into other creatures–such as dragons–we find symbolic tradition (dragons = Satan). To do some sort of “some dragons are good” rendition is actuall a perversion of the meaning of the tradition–like calling good, bad and bad, good.

    In this instance, there is a long tradition of using weasels and stoats as villains. I would hold up Wind in the Willows. Ratty is a good guy, but then again he is a water rat, not a regular house rat. This tradition finds its source in rats spreading horrible diseases in the Middle Ages. They were a plague upon mankind, hence them being mostly typecast ever since.

    All of that to say, I am not sure we should read our modern issues into literary tradition. There is a richness that is more than skin deep. ;)

    Besides, Brian Jasques is not American. Racism isn't quite the issue there as it is here, because their slavery problem was solved earlier than ours and solved through repentance and legislation and prayer rather than war and subsequent “Jim Crow” and other types of laws. I'm not sure I'd look for racism in a British author unless he's known for that sort of thing.

  • KimbrahG

    Todd, that is a very good point, too. I don't think that most authors, including this one, have the intention of promoting any sort of racism, but it effect they do because in a lot of these stories there has to be absolute evil for good to prevail, and usually the “evil” ones (be it rats or rodents or Huns or fill in the blank) are allowed no opportunity for redemption within the role that has been cast for them within the story.

  • KimbrahG

    Brandy- I think you also make very good points about literary tradition and I did not include orcs and goblins in my previous comment because their history in general is so rooted in “devilry”. Also a good point about the British history of abolition.

    I wanted to be clear also, that I am not completely discarding this book because it doesn't agree with our convictions, I just feel it isn't the right time to introduce it to our family.

    There were also quite a few more instances of violence that I did not mention. In a burst of heroics and revenge (and anger) he viciously whacks off the snake Asmodeus' head. I believe it was 7 or 8 whacks in all to sever it. I think your girls would cry, even though Asmodeus is a villain. I'm just saying. :)

    Also, Matthias has real anger/temper issues that are not often addressed. There is one time that Basil Stag Hare calls him on it and Matthias laughs and realizes what a cad his is being, but to my remembrance, that is the only time. As one of mine (and his mother) has a real struggle with keeping his temper, this is also another reason I would hold back on it for now.

  • http://schleitheim.com martyrologist

    Lewis and Tolkein both wrote amid the context of war. The good and evil/us and them mentality was present. I think that led to having sides, within the stories, chosen based on what type/species the individual was. Wolves and orcs were on the “bad” side, while lions and fawns and bears were on the “good” side. We as parents are responsible for making sure that black and white ideology doesn't envelope our kids. By not being open about different races and skin colors (blacks and whites and tans, etc), we can propogate racism: kids will associate good and nice with light skinned people, while dark skinned people will be suspicious and bad. I think CNN recently did a series on it, within the last couple months or so.

  • Mil

    Anthropomorphism is no license for gratuitous, sensational violence. Nothing is.

  • Daniel_sedelmayer

    Two of the examples for the “lack of mercy” are very weak ones. Shadow dies before anyone in the Abbey could help him (show him mercy), and Matthias could obviously little more than observe Scragg’s murder. After all, he was a mere unarmed young mouse with an infant (!) at his side. The smartest move was indeed to stay hidden.
    And your explanation on behalf of “All pacifists are fools and victims”:
    The book series proves, that in many cases, diplomacy fails when the abbey dwellers struggle against attackers. And if the enemy is armed, combat-ready and actually attacking, one must bear arms, if he doesn’t want to get defeated. In self-defense, obviously. The abbot however, is a systematically peaceful creature, who will always cast an eye on a peaceful alternative to the given situation, which has little to do with naivety. After all, he still understands that fighting is inevitable, but still hopes for the better.

    But apart from that, it is quite a fair review. Though one must note, that the books are specifically aimed at young adults, and not at small children.

  • Mary Elizabeth

    Yes, there is violence in Brian Jacques works, and I must say detail is not absent in that or in anything else. I was reading the comments above and I want to point somethings out. Yes, there is SOME racism in the books, BUT… in Redwall, the good characters are willing to be kind to the rats and treat them as equals. Not all the rats are evil. I read a book in which there was a rat who changed sides and I tell you I cried with joy when that happened. :) And not all your labeled “good” creatures are good. I have read a few books in which your typical good character turned out to be a bad character.
    But, LOOK at the moral values of the books themselves:

    They are SO different from Harry Potter or Twilight, there isn’t any love triangles, highschool drama (as if there wasn’t enough!), there is no parallels writen in the books based on drama in this complex world. It is good v. evil. Where in the end, no matter how much suffering and violence and loss…good will triumph in the end. Although I don’t think Brian Jacques intended to have any biblical references to his series, I can see one. No matter how much evil and hatred and war and slavery etc there is in the world, there is one thing that is in everyones hearts. Hope….a hope that there will be redemptation and knowing that in the end, good shall triumph over evil!
    Yes, I quite agree that this isn’t for YOUNG childeren, but I believe that children ages eight and infinity will love this series. I’m sorry if this won’t convince you to read this series, I could go on a rant all day and give a deep and moving speech but I have a class to go to now and I am battling with a cold. Sadly, I don’t think Martin’s sword will help much. :(
    A few final things though.
     The rats HAD to all die. If they didn’t they would go on killing innocent lives if they weren’t stopped. Also, with Matthias and Sam there…Sam was a BABY and there were vermin about. If Matthias had gone out to help Scragg, he would be putting the babe (Dibbun) in danger.
    One final thing. Have you only read ONE book or have you read at least six??? Don’t just read one book and judge. I have read all the books and I have learned so much!! There are a lot of positive moral values in the books. Don’t just point out some things and decide (and TELL) everyone that it is a bad book. Maybe if I get response to this or if I feel better later, I’ll give a better review and defense. ;)
    God bless and I hope you’ll have a blessed season! :)
    ~Mary Elizabeth Age 15 3/4